In a blog entry on your website under the headline "Copyright vultures score again" you report on the action taken by Universal Edition to prevent imslp.org from distributing copyright material on their website.It's certainly not Universal's fault; it's a combination of stupid copyright laws which vary from country to country, and the inability of volunteer web operators to keep up with the details. It's also true that IMSLP probably could have figured out a way to comply without shutting down.
To quote your report, you write "One of the best free-sheet-music sites, the IMSLP, got killed by the copyright vultures today."
This wild accusation is simply not true.
Universal Edition requested by letter that a limited number of works be removed from the IMSLP website, as these were protected by copyright in some of the countries the IMSLP database was available in (one composer is also fully in copyright in Canada itself). IMSLP refused to remove these works over a 2 month period, and instead, in a decision incomprehensible to us, decided to close down the whole website.
The motives behind closing down the website, which as all agree contained a valuable collection of public domain music, cannot be justified by nor blamed on the demand by UE that its copyright material be removed.
...Please feel free to report the facts behing this unfortunate issue, but please check those first. UE is being used as a scapegoat to explain why the student running the service felt it necessary to go offline.
UE of course respects the perfectly valid and legal distribution of public domain material on the internet. We are however obliged to follow up violations of our copyrights.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
UE defends itself in IMSLP shutdown
As was reported a few days ago, public-domain orchestral music website IMSLP shut down after receiving a cease-and-desist notice from Universal Edition. In response to that report, we received the following from Universal Edition.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
""To quote your report, you write "One of the best free-sheet-music sites, the IMSLP, got killed by the copyright vultures today."
This wild accusation is simply not true.""If UE hadn't done what they had done, IMSLP would not be closed . It wasn't a direct result of UE but indirectly, it is UE's fault.
""Universal Edition requested by letter that a limited number of works be removed from the IMSLP website, as these were protected by copyright in some of the countries the IMSLP database was available in.""If you read the BBC article on the situation, just because it is illegal in Europe doesn't mean much, warnings are sufficient (as other's have said) and Eu does not have jurisdiction in Canada.
"" (one composer is also fully in copyright in Canada itself).""IMSLP has told UE many times that the composer was hosted on the US server NOT the Canadian server. The piece is PD in the US. UE know about this so I don't know why they are continuing to produce this propaganda.
""IMSLP refused to remove these works over a 2 month period, and instead, in a decision incomprehensible to us, decided to close down the whole website.""UE have read the main page in which the owner addresses the issues to temporarily close the website.
""The motives behind closing down the website, which as all agree contained a valuable collection of public domain music, cannot be justified by nor blamed on the demand by UE that its copyright material be removed.""It should also be noted that UE demanded 2000 Euros per infringing piece, and as there were over 60 pieces, that comes to over 120,000 euros.
""UE of course respects the perfectly valid and legal distribution of public domain material on the internet. We are however obliged to follow up violations of our copyrights.""This sentence assumes that they are violations and that Europe has jurisdiction in Canada.
Post a Comment