Here's the completely pronoun-free Creed we're using now:
I believe in God, the almighty,Gotta appreciate the technical deftness of using all those participle clauses to evade the pronouns, but what's the point? Who really thinks that we'll be able to get rid of all pronouns? And of course, why try to conceal Jesus' gender?
creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Jesus Christ, God's only Child, our Lord,
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried.
Having descended to the dead,
and having risen on the third day,
Christ ascended into heaven,
is seated at the right hand of God,
and will come to judge the living and the dead.
I think a hint to the last question came in the sermon from the week before, which was basically about how wicked men are (all warlike and competitive and everything), and how much better things would be if we all adopted women's values and became all nurturing and caring and everything. The irony is almost laugh-out-loud funny: gender stereotypes as a rationale for gender equality. But I think this pastor and his PC supporters are actually embarrassed that Jesus was a male.
1 comment:
I agree with you that this can get out of hand, Allen. You asked a question about covering up the "male-ness" of Jesus. I have heard it explained that because of the duality of Christ as a male human and as God, there are points in which it becomes innapropriate to refer to Jesus as solely a male. For example, is the resurrected Christ a male? The duality of Christ makes this a most complex issue without a clear answer.
Post a Comment